Special Issue Editors: Heather Edgar and Marin Pilloud

Published: 2022-02-10

A Reassessment of Assessing Race

“Ancestry” Estimation and Its Implications for Forensic Anthropology and Beyond

Heather Edgar, Marin Pilloud

205–210

Abstract

The articles in this special issue grew from a symposium at the 2020 American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Scientific meeting, with the...

--Read More

Assumed Differences; Unquestioned Typologies

The Oversimplification of Race and Ancestry in Forensic Anthropology

Sean D. Tallman, Nicolette M. Parr, Allysha P. Winburn

211–234

Abstract

Forensic anthropologists traditionally estimate “race” or “ancestry” as part of the biological profile. While practitioners may have changed the...

--Read More

The (Mis)appropriation of Biological Anthropology in Race Science and the Implications for Forensic Anthropology

Donovan M. Adams, Marin A. Pilloud

235–256

Abstract

Most biological anthropologists acknowledge that phenotypic human variation is distinct from human race. However, there is the potential for the...

--Read More

Terminology Used to Describe Human Variation in Forensic Anthropology

Marin A. Pilloud, Cassie E. Skipper, SaMoura L. Horsley, Alba Craig, Krista Latham, Chaunesey M. J. Clemmons, Katie Zejdlik, Deborah A. Boehm, Casey S. Philbin

257–282

Abstract

To understand the implications of the forensic anthropological practice of “ancestry” estimation, we explore terminology that has been employed...

--Read More

On WEIRD Anthropologists and Their White Skeletons

Matthew C. Go, Nandar Yukyi, Elaine Y. Chu

283–298

Abstract

Most forensic anthropologists and the populations they study are WEIRD—that is, Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic. In...

--Read More

Testing the Homogeneity of “White”

Dental Morphology in Americans and Australians of European Descent

Heather Edgar, Stephen D. Ousley

299–308

Abstract

The purpose of estimating each part of the biological profile is to reduce the number of missing persons for comparison with unknown human...

--Read More

What Are We Really Estimating in Forensic Anthropological Practice, Population Affinity or Ancestry?

Kate Spradley, Richard L. Jantz

309–318

Abstract

While American forensic anthropologists often state that they estimate ancestry, is that what they are really estimating? Although typological...

--Read More

Self-Reported Ancestry and Craniofacial SNPs

Assessing Correspondence with Implications for Forensic Case Analysis and Reporting

Kamar Afra, Michelle D. Hamilton, Bridget F. B. Algee-Hewitt

319–329

Abstract

Genotype-phenotype studies increasingly link single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) to the dimensions of the face for presumed homogeneous...

--Read More

Ancestry Estimation in Practice

An Evaluation of Forensic Anthropology Reports in the United States

Hillary Parsons

330–340

Abstract

The medicolegal system relies on forensic anthropologists to construct accurate biological profiles from skeletal remains
to narrow the pool...

--Read More

Explanation of Ancestry Estimation in Forensic Anthropology Textbooks

Lessons for the Undergraduate Classroom

Amelia R. Hubbard

341–359

Abstract

The way we teach about race and racism can have profound impacts on undergraduate learners, both positive and negative. Textbooks represent a...

--Read More