Locating Failure, Interrogating Method Scientific Responses to Clinical Trial Failure for Traumatic Brain Injury Treatments
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Though persistent failure of clinical trials poses a challenge for multiple conditions, traumatic brain injury (TBI) is especially difficult to study because of its heterogeneity, complexity, unpredictable outcomes, and resistance to definition and classification. This article analyzes published discourse among researchers about the failure of two large trials for progesterone as a traumatic brain injury (TBI) treatment. The analysis specifically examines how researchers respond to trial failure and how TBI functions as a diagnostic construct. I draw on theories of kairos and multiple ontologies to argue that, while evidence-based medicine constructs TBI as a coherent entity in order to study it through randomized controlled trials, this entity breaks down in practice into multiple temporalities and spaces that are not sufficiently coordinated.
Article Details
References
Agoston, Denes V. (2017). How to translate time? The temporal aspect of human and rodent biology. Frontiers in Neurology, 8, 1-3.
Alves, José L., Rato, Joana, & Silva, Vitor. (2019). Why does brain trauma research fail? World Neurosurgery, 130, 115-121.
Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh, & Fojo, Tito. (2012). Why do Phase III clinical trials in oncology fail so often? JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104(8), 568-9.
Arribas-Allyon, Michael, Bartlett, Andrew, & Featherstone, Katie. (2010). Complexity and accountability: The witches’ brew of psychiatric genetics. Social Studies of Science, 40(4), 499-524.
Barrett-Fox, Jason, & Clegg, Geoffrey. (2018). Beyond hearts and minds: Posthumanism, kairos, and technical communication in U. S. Army Field Manual 3-24, Counterinsurgency. In Daniel P. Richards & Kristen R, Moore (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 237-254). Routledge.
Bramlett, Helen M., & Dietrich, W. Dalton. (2015). Long term consequences of traumatic brain injury: Current status of potential mechanisms of injury and neurological outcomes. Journal of Neurotrauma, 32, 1834-1848.
Brives, Charlotte. (2013). Identifying ontologies in a clinical trial. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 397-416.
Bowker, Geoffrey C., & Star, Susan L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. The MIT Press.
Cartwright, Nancy. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? Biosocieties, 2, 11-20.
Cartwright, Nancy. (2010). What are randomised controlled trials good for? Philosophical Studies, 147(59).
Corrigan, John D., & Hammond, Flora M. (2013). Traumatic brain injury as a chronic health condition. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(6), 1199-1201.
Cwiartka, Monika. (2011). How do mice mean? The rhetoric of measurement in the medical laboratory. In John Leach & Deborah Dysart-Gale (Eds.), Rhetorical questions of health and medicine (33-58). Lexington Books.
Derkatch, Colleen. (2016). Bounding biomedicine: Evidence and rhetoric in the new science of alternative medicine. University of Chicago Press.
Derkatch, Colleen, & Segal, Judy Z. (2005). Realms of rhetoric in health and medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, 82(2), 138-142.
Foley, Megan. (2010). Serializing racial subjects: The stagnation and suspense of the O.J. Simpson saga. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 96(1), 69-88.
Foucault, Michel. (1963). The birth of the clinic: An archeology of medical perception (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage.
Eskin, Catherine. (2002). Hippocrates, kairos, and writing in the sciences. In Phillip Sipiora & James S. Baumlin (Eds.), Rhetoric and kairos: Essays in history, theory, and praxis (pp. 97-113). University of New York Press.
Frieden, Thomas R. (2017). Evidence for health decision making—Beyond randomized, controlled trials. The New England Journal of Medicine, 377(5), 465-475.
Gigante, Maria E. (2018). Argumentation by self-model: Missing methods and opportunities in the personal narratives of popular health coaches. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 48(3), 259-280.
Goldstein, Felicia C., Caveney, Angela F., Hertzberg, Vicki S., Silbergleit, Robert, Yeatts, Sharon D., Palesch, Yuko Y., Levin, Harvey S., & Wright, David W. (2017). Very early administration of progesterone does not improve neuropsychological outcomes in subjects with moderate to severe TBI. Journal of Neurotrauma, 34(1), 115-120.
Graham, S. Scott. (2011). Dis-ease or disease? Ontological rarefaction in the medical-industrial complex. Journal of Medical Humanities, 32, 167-186.
Graham, S. Scott. (2015). The politics of pain medicine: A rhetorical-ontology inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Grant, David A. (2016, June 14). I can fix you. Brainline. http://www.brainline.org/content/2016/06/i-can-fix-you.html
Hack, Dallas. C. (2016). TBI clinical trials: Past, present, and future. The Bridge, 46(1), 34-38.
Harker, Michael. (2007). The ethics of argument: Rereading kairos and making sense in a timely fashion. College Composition and Communication, 59(1), 77-97.
Hawryluk, Gregory W. J., & Bullock, M. Ross. (2015) Design of acute neuroprotection studies. In Jordan H. Grafman & Andres M. Salazar (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology, vol. 128 (pp. 761-778). Elsevier.
Hawryluk, Gregory W. J., & Manley, Geoffrey T. (2015). Classification of traumatic brain injury: Past, present, and future. In Jordan H. Grafman & Andres M. Salazar (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology, vol. 127 (pp. 15-21). Elsevier.
Howard, Randy B., Sayeed, Iqbal, & Stein, Donald G. (2017). Suboptimal dosing parameters as possible factors in the negative phase III clinical trials of progesterone for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 34, 1915-1918.
Ioannidis, John P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), 0696-0701.
Jon. (2012, November 28). Jon’s story. BrainInjuryStories.org. https://braininjurystories.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/736/
Kabadi, Shruti V., & Faden, Alan I. (2014). Neuroprotective strategies for traumatic brain injury: Improving clinical translation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15, 1216-1236.
Kelly, Ann H., & McGoey, Linsey. (2018). Facts, power, and global evidence: A new empire of truth. Economy and Society, 47(1), 1-26. doi:10.1080/03085147.2018.1457261.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. (2014). Reconceptualizing kairos. In Eyjólfur K. Emilsson, Anastasia Maravela, & Mathilde Skoie (Eds.), Paradeigmata: Studies in honor of Øivind Andersen (pp. 250-258). Norwegian Institute at Athens.
Knaapen, Loes. (2014). Evidence-based medicine or cookbook medicine? Addressing concerns over the standardization of care. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 823-836.
Leston, Robert. (2013). Unhinged: Kairos and the invention of the untimely. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 21(1), 29-50.
Lindsley, Tom. (2015). Legitimizing the wound: Mapping the military’s diagnostic discourse of traumatic brain injury. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24, 235-257.
Maas, Andrew I. R., Menon, David K., Lingsma, Hester F., Pineda, Jose A., Sandel, M. Elizabeth, & Manley, Geoffrey T. (2012). Re-orientation of clinical research in traumatic brain injury: Report of an international workshop on comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29, 32-46.
Marklund, Niklas, & Hillered, Lars. (2011). Animal modelling of traumatic brain injury in preclinical drug development: Where do we go from here? British Journal of Pharmacology, 164(4), 1207-29.
Masel, Brent E., & DeWitt, Douglas S. (2010). Traumatic brain injury: A disease process, not an event. Journal of Neurotrauma, 27, 1529-1540.
Menon, David K., & Maas, Andrew I. R. (2015). Progress, failures and new approaches for TBI research. Nature Reviews Neurology, 11(2), 1-2.
Mol, Annmarie. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
Montgomery, Catherine M., & Pool, Robert. (2017). From “trial community” to “experimental publics”: How clinical research shapes public participation. Critical Public Health, 27(1), 50-62.
Murphy, John F. A. (2016). The evolution of randomised control trials. Irish Medical Journal, 109(6), 416.
Norris, Jeffrey. (2014, October 1). $17M DoD award aims to improve clinical trials for traumatic brain injury. University of California San Francisco News.
Piras, Enrico Maria. (2018). Kairotic and chronological knowing: diabetes logbooks in-and-out of the hospital. Data Technologies and Applications, 52(1), 148-162.
Progesterone in Traumatic Brain Injury. [Grouped Letters to the Editor]. (2015, April 30). New England Journal of Medicine, 372(18), 1765-1767.
Rickert, Thomas. (2013). Ambient Rhetoric. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Roozenbeek, Bob, Lingsma, Hester F., & Maas, Andrew I. R. (2012). New considerations in the design of clinical trials for traumatic brain injury. Clinical Investigations, 2(2), 153-162.
Rosengarten, Marsha, & Savransky, Martin. (2019). A careful biomedicine? Generalization and abstraction in RCTs. Critical Public Health, 29(2), 181-191.
Rubenfeld, Gordon D. (2015). Confronting the frustrations of negative clinical trials in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 12, S58-S63.
Sackett, David L., Rosenberg, William M. C., Gray, J. A. Muir, Haynes, R. Brian, & Richardson, W. Scott (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.
Saldaña, Johnny. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Schumacher, Michael, Denier, Christian, Oudinet, Jean-Paul, Adams, David, & Guennoun, Rachida. (2016). Progesterone neuroprotection: The background of clinical trial failure. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 160, 53-66.
Schwamm, Lee. H. (2014). Progesterone for traumatic brain injury—Resisting the siren’s song. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(26), 2522-2523.
Scott, J. Blake. (2006). Kairos as indeterminate risk management: The pharmaceutical industry’s response to bioterrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(2), 115-143.
Scott, J. Blake, & Melonçon, Lisa. (2018). Manifesting methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine. In Lisa Melonçon & J. Blake Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 1-23). Routledge.
Segal, Judy Z. (2005). Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Southern Illinois UP.
Segal, Judy Z. (2009). Rhetoric of health & medicine. In Andrea A. Lunsford, Rosa A. Eberly, & Kirt H. Wilson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 227-246). Sage.
Shultz, Sandy R., McDonald, Stuart J., Vonder Haar, Cole, Meconi, Alicia, Vink, Robert, van Donkelaar, Paul, Taneja, Chand, Iverson, Grant L., & Christie, Brian R. (2017). The potential for animal models to provide insight into mild traumatic brain injury: Translational challenges and strategies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 76(Pt B), 396-414.
Skolnick, Brett E., Maas, Andrew I., Narayan, Raj K., van der Hoop, Ronald G., MacAllister, Thomas, Ward, John D., Nelson, Neta R., & Stocchetti, Nino. (2014). A clinical trial of progesterone for severe traumatic brain injury. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(26), 2467-76.
Smith, John E. (2002). Time and qualitative time. In Phillip Sipiora & James S. Baumlin (Eds.), Rhetoric and kairos: Essays in history, theory, and praxis (pp. 46-57). University of New York Press.
Sniderman, Allan D, LaChapelle, Kevin J., Rachon, Nikodem A., & Furberg, Curt D. (2013). The necessity for clinical reasoning in the era of evidence-based medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88(10), 1108-1114.
Stein, Donald G. (2015). Embracing failure: What the Phase III progesterone studies can teach about TBI clinical trials. Brain Injury, 29(11), 1259-1272.
Stein, Donald G. (2016). Lost in translation: Understanding the failure of the progesterone/traumatic brain injury Phase III trials. Future Neurology, 11(1), 9-13.
Stein, Donald G. (2017). Lost and found: What we have learned from the progesterone for traumatic brain injury trials. Future Neurology, 12(2), 57-59.
Stein, Donald G., Geddes, Rastafa I., & Sribnick, Eric A. (2015). Recent developments in clinical trials for the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Handbook of clinical neurology, vol. 127 (pp. 433-451). Elsevier.
Stein, Donald G., Howard, Randy B., & Sayeed, Iqbal. (2017). Why did the Phase III clinical trials for progesterone in TBI fail? An analysis of three potentially critical factors. In Kim A. Heidenreich (Ed.), New therapeutics for traumatic brain injury: Prevention of secondary brain damage and enhancement of repair and regeneration (pp. 3-18). Academic Press.
Teston, Christa. (2012). Moving from artifact to action: A grounded investigation of visual displays of evidence during medical deliberations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 187-209.
Teston, Christa. (2017). Bodies in flux: Scientific methods for negotiating medical uncertainty. U of Chicago Press.
Winderman, Emily. (2017). Times for birth: Chronic and kairotic mediated temporalities in TLC’s A Baby’s Story. Feminist Media Studies, 17(3), 347-361.
Wright, David. W., Yeatts, Sharon D., Silbergleit, Robert, Palesch, Yuko Y., Hertzberg, Vicki S., Frankel, Michael, Goldstein, Felicia C., Caveney, Angela F., Howlett-Smith, Harriet, Bengelink, Erin M., Manley, Geoffrey T., Merck, Lisa H., Janis, L. Scott, & Barsan, William G. (2014). Very early administration of progesterone for acute traumatic brain injury. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371(26). 2457-2466