Rehumanizing Rhetoric, Recuperative Ethos, and Human Specimens: A Case Study of the Indiana Medical History Museum
Main Article Content
Abstract
Using the Indiana Medical History Museum’s (IMHM) “Rehumanizing the Specimens” project as a case study, this essay explores the impact of language on rehumanizing human specimens in medical museums. The individuals represented by these specimens are often dehumanized because they are reduced to specific illnesses or injuries and/or because they are viewed as curiosities rather than representations of actual people. Further, the specimens at the IMHM were obtained from former patients of Central State Hospital, a psychiatric facility in operation from 1848 until 1994, so these individuals experienced additional dehumanization due to the stigma surrounding their mental illness diagnoses. To resist these forms of dehumanization, the IMHM launched the “Rehumanizing the Specimens” project, which used historical records and documents to develop narratives outlining the lived experiences of the 48 people represented by the specimens. Particularly, the narratives engaged rehumanizing rhetoric (Winderman & Landau, 2020) and recuperative ethos (Molloy, 2015), and I argue for the effectiveness of these rehumanizing strategies. In addition to offering suggestions for how these strategies can be adopted by other medical museums, I extend the discussion to healthcare providers, applying what was learned from the case study to the contemporary study and practice of medicine.
Article Details
References
References
Frost, Erin A., Gonzales, Laura, Moeller, Marie E., Patterson, GPat, & Shelton, Cecilia D. (2021). Reimagining the boundaries of health and medical discourse in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1931457
Goodday, Sarah M., Geddes, John R., & Friend, Stephen H. (2021). Disrupting the power balance between doctors and patients in the digital era. The Lancet, 3(3), 142-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00004-2
Haque, Omar Sultan, & Waytz, Adam. (2012). Dehumanization in medicine: Causes, solutions,
and functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 176–186. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41613554
Haslam, Nick. (2007). Humanising medical practice: The role of empathy. The Medical Journal
of Australia, 187(7), 381-382.
Indiana Medical History Museum. (n.d.-a). About the Indiana Medical History Museum. https://www.imhm.org/about/
Indiana Medical History Museum. (n.d.-b). Rehumanizing the IMHM specimen collection. https://imhm.org/explore
Indiana Medical History Museum. (n.d.-c). Rehumanizing the specimens. Indianapolis, IN.
Klugman, Craig M., Bracken, Rachel Conrad, Weatherston, Rosemary I., Konefal, Catherine Burns,
& Berry, Sarah L. (2021). Developing new academic programs in the medical/health humanities: A toolkit to support continued growth. Journal of Medical Humanities, 42(4), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-021-09710-5
Knispel, Sandra. (2023, January 19). The ethics of dark tourism. University of Rochester News
Center. Retrieved June 9, 2023, from https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/the-ethics-of-dark-tourism-destinations-europe-547462/
La Carmina. (2017, October 27). Mütter Museum in Philadelphia review: Gothic skulls and medical
curiosities! Philly goth travel guide. La Carmina. https://www.lacarmina.com/blog/2017/10/mutter-medical-museum-philly-goth-stores/
Molloy, Cathryn. (2015). Recuperative ethos and agile epistemologies: Toward a vernacular
engagement with mental illness ontologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45(2), 138-163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24753665
National Museum of Health and Medicine. (2022). About the museum.
https://medicalmuseum.health.mil/index.cfm?p=visit.about
Piemonte, Nicole. (2017). More to the story: How the medical humanities can learn from and
enrich health communication studies. Review of Communication, 17(3), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2017.1331254
Quinn, Kate, & Irons, Mira. (2023, March 21). Looking for our videos? Mütter Museum.
https://muttermuseum.org/stories/videos/looking-our-videos
Scott, J. Blake, & Melonçon, Lisa. (2018). Manifesting methodologies for the rhetoric of health
and medicine. In Lisa Melonçon & J. Blake Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 1-23). Routledge.
Shalev, Daniel, & McCann, Ruth. (2020). Can the medical humanities make trainees more
compassionate? A neurobehavioral perspective. Academic Psychiatry, 44, 606-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01180-6
Wailoo, Keith. (2022). Patients are humans too: The emergence of medical humanities.
Daedalus, 151(3), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01938
Wald, Hedy S., McFarland, Jonathan, & Markovina, Irina. (2019). Medical humanities in
medical education and practice. Medical Teacher, 41(5), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497151
Wertheimer, Olivia [@kingdomfantasy6]. (2023, June 7). Okay, let’s talk about this thread, and
the Mütter Museum, because there’s a LOT of fearmongering going on here [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/kingdomfantasy6/status/1666574855825768448
Winderman, Emily, & Landau, Jamie. (2020). From HeLa cells to Henrietta Lacks:
Rehumanization and pathos as interventions for the rhetoric of health and medicine. In Lisa Melonçon, S. Scott Graham, Jenell Johnson, John A. Lynch, & Cynthia Ryan (Eds.), Rhetoric of health and medicine as/is: Theories and approaches for the field (pp. 52-73). Ohio State University Press.