Standardizing Genres in Biomedicine
Main Article Content
Abstract
Reporting guidelines have emerged in recent years as a critical site of deliberation and intervention for stakeholders in the biomedical community. These texts have historically been used to formulate standards for quality reporting and bring consistency to processes of writing and publication; they also operate as a space in which practitioners promote values, define expectations, and coordinate action in line with established standards and practices in the field. Drawing on scholarship in rhetoric and genre studies, this article examines how reporting guidelines contribute to the standardization of writing and publishing activity in biomedicine, functioning both as semi-procedural documents that take part in the “genre-ing” of published research and as public displays of and arguments for accountability that can be used to regulate the work of knowledge making over time. I conclude by discussing how rhetoricians might use reporting guidelines as a strategic locus for conceptualizing and potentially shaping research and writing activity in different areas of health and medicine.
Article Details
References
References
Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of Medical Literature (1987). A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106, 598-604. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-598
Altman, D. G., Simera, I., Hoey, J., Moher, D., & Schulz, K. F. (2008). EQUATOR: Reporting guidelines for health research. The Lancet, 31, 1149-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60505-X
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Lang, T. (2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(8), 663-694. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
Altman, D. G., & Simera, I. (2016). A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: The long road to the EQUATOR Network. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 109(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076815625599
Ankeny, R. A. (2017). The role of patient perspective in clinical case reporting. In R. Bluhm (Ed.), Knowing and Acting in Medicine (pp. 97-113). Rowman and Littlefield.
Wickman, C. (2023). “Genre and Metagenre in Biomedical Research Writing.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 37(2), 140-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651922114311
Wickman, C. (2022). The medical case report as genre and social practice. In C. Hanganu Bresch, M. Zerbe, G. Cutrufello, & S. M. Maci (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication (pp. 213-224). New York: Routledge.
Bawarshi, A. S. (2016). Beyond the genre fixation: A translingual perspective on genre. College English, 78(3), 243-249.
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. Parlor Press and The WAC Clearinghouse.
Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What Writing Does and How it Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices (pp. 83-96). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., Pitkin, R., Rennie, D., Schulz, K. F., Simel, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. JAMA, 276(8), 637-639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Schlich, T., & Weisz, G. (2006). Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 63(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.007
Calster, B. V., Wynants, L., Riley, R. D., van Smeden, M., & Collins, G. S. (2021). Methodology over metrics: Current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 138, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018
Cook, D. J., Sackett, D. L., & Spitzer, W. (1995). Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in health care from the Potsdam consultation on meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 167–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00172-m
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark, V. L. P., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
Cumpston, M., Flemyng, E., Thomas, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Deeks, J. J., Clarke, M. J. (2023). Chapter I: Introduction. In J. P. T. Higgins, T. J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.4 (updated August 2023). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Derkatch, C. (2016). Bounding biomedicine: Evidence and rhetoric in the new science of alternative medicine. University of Chicago Press.
Derkatch, C. (2008). Method as argument: Boundary work in evidence-based medicine. Social Epistemology, 22(4), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720802559412
Devitt, A. J. (2004). Writing Genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP.
Djulbegovic, B., & Guyatt, G. (2020). Evidence-based medicine in times of crisis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 126, 164-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.002
EQUATOR Network. (2023, 2 March). “EQUATOR Network: what we do and how we are organized.” https://www.equator-network.org/.
Emmons, K. K. (2009). Uptake and the biomedical subject. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a Changing World (pp. 154-181). The WAC Clearinghouse.
Freadman, A. S. (2012). The traps and trappings of genre theory. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 544-563. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/applin/ams050
Freadman, A. S. (2002). Uptake. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 187-205). Hampton Press.
Frith, J. (2020). Technical standards and a theory of writing as infrastructure, Written Communication, 37(3), 401-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916553
Giltrow, J. (2002). Meta-Genre. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 187-205). Hampton Press.
Graham, S. S. (2020). Where’s the rhetoric? Imagining a unified field. Ohio State University Press.
Guyatt, G. H. (1991). Evidence-based medicine. American College of Physicians Journal Club, 114(2), A-16. https://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-1991-114-2-A16
Guyatt G., Cairns J., Churchill D., Cook D., Haynes B., Hirsh J., Irvine J., Levine M., Levine M., Nishikawa J., Sackett D., Brill-Edwards P., Gerstein H., Gibson J., Jaeschke R., Kerigan A., Neville A., Panju A., Detsky A., Enkin M., Frid P., Gerrity M., Laupacis A., Lawrence V., Menard J., Moyer V., Mulrow C., Links P., Oxman A., Sinclair J., & Tugwell, P. (1992). Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268, 2420-2425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
Hopewell, S., Boutron, I., & Moher, D. (2020). CONSORT and its extensions for reporting clinical trials. In S. Piantadosi & C. L. Meinert (Eds.), Principles and practices of clinical trials (pp. 1-15). Springer Link. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52677-5_188-1
Jamieson, K. M. (1975). Antecedent genre as rhetorical constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61(4), 406-415.
MacNealy, M. S. (1997). Toward better case study research. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.649554
Mehlenbacher, A. (2019) Science communication online: Engaging experts and publics on the Internet. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
McNely, B. (2017). Moments and metagenres: Coordinating complex, multigenre narratives. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(4), 443-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917713252
Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2),151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz K. F., Montori, V. Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. The Lancet, 354, 1896-9000. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5
Molloy, C., & Hensley Owens, K. (2022). Variants and/in/of the rhetoric of health and medicine. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2022.5001
Palayew, A., Norgaard, O., Safreed-Harmon, K., Andersen, T. H., Rasmussen, Lauge N., & Lazarus, J. V. (2021). Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 666-669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0
Orkin, A. M., Gill, P. J., Ghersi, D., Campbell, L., Sugarman, J., Emsley, R., Steg, P. G., Weijer, C., Simes, J., Rombey, T., Williams, H. C., Wittes, J., Moher, D., Richards, D. P., Kasamon, Y., Getz, K., Hopewell, S., Dickersin, K., Wu, T., Ayala, P.A., …Chan, A.-W. (2021). Guidelines for reporting trial protocols and completed trials modified due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other extenuating circumstances. JAMA, 326(3), 257-265.
Quinn, T. J., Burton, J. K., Carter, B., Cooper, N., Dwan, K., Field, R., Freeman, S. C., Geue, C., Hsieh, P.-H., McGill, K., Nevill, C. R., Rana, D., Sutton, A., Rowan, M. T., & Xin, Y. (2021). Following the science? Comparison of methodological and reporting quality of covid-19 and other research from the first wave of the pandemic. BMC Medicine, 19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.9941
Read, S. (2019). The infrastructural function: A relational theory of infrastructure for writing studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(3), 233-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919834980
Rounsaville, A. (2012). Selecting genres for transfer: The role of uptake in students’ antecedent genre knowledge. Composition Forum, 26.
Rademaker, M. M., Ramakers, G. G. J., Smit, A., Hooft, L., & Stegeman, I. (2020). The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of “unclear” risk of bias reporting in Cochrane systematic reviews. PLoS One, 15(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235535
Sackett, D. (1997). Evidence-based medicine. Seminars in Perinatology, 21(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80013-4
Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2nd Ed.). London: SAGE.
Schulz, K. F., Douglas, G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332
Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: Reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Medicine, 8(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-24
Schryer, C. F., & Spoel, P. (2005). Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 249-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190527562
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2019). The future of EAP genre studies: A personal viewpoint. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.003
The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. (1994). A proposal for structured reporting of randomized trials. JAMA, 272(24), 1926-31. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520240054041
Teston, C. (2017). Bodies in flux: Scientific methods for negotiating medical uncertainty. University of Chicago Press.¬¬¬¬
Teston, C. (2009). A grounded investigation of genred guidelines in cancer care deliberations. Written Communication, 26(3), 220–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309336937
Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Temple University Press.
Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science, 27(2), 273-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312970270020
Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Moher, D. (2012). Does the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Systematic Reviews, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-60
Weisz, G., Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Knaapen, L., Schlich, T., & Tournay, V.J. (2007). The emergence of clinical practice guidelines. The Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 691-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00505.x
Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature (1994). Call for comments on a proposal to improve reporting of clinical trials in the biomedical literature. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121(11), 894-895. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-121-11-199412010-00015
Appendix: Reference Information for Reporting Guidelines
(“Main Study Types” ordered chronologically by year of publication)
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA, 285(15), 1987-1991. https://doi.org/doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987
The AGREE-Collaboration (2003). Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.1.18
Bossuyt P. M., Reitsma J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis C. A., Glasziou P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C.W. (2003). Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138, 41-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
Davidoff, F., & Batalden, P. (2005). Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The beginning of a consensus project. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14(5), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.014787
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Kilkenny, Carol, Browne, William J., Cuthill, Ines C., Emerson, Michael, & Altman, Douglas G. (2010). Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biology, 8(6), Article e1000412. https://doi.org/10.1371journal.pbio.1000412
Chan A.-W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Altman, D. G., Laupacis, A., Gøtzsche, P. C., Krleža-Jerić, K., Hróbjartsson, A., Mann, H., Dickersin, K., Berlin, J. A., Doré, C., Parulekar, W. R., Summerskill, W. S. M., Groves, T., Schulz, K. F., Sox, H. C., Rockhold, F. W., Rennie, D., & Moher, D. (2013). SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine,158(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., Riley, & The CARE Group (2013). The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 2(5), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.008
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Brigs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. European Journal of Health Economics, 14, 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0471-6
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388