Ethics and Practice of Knowledge Integrity in Communicating Health and Medical Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
Rhetoric of health and medicine (RHM) knowledge integrity is explored in the context of preparing RHM students, researchers, and practitioners to be careful curators and communicators of information from the medical literature. More specifically, the goal of this article is to provide a systematic framework for researching and citing claims, or “facts,” from the medical literature with transferrable skills beyond the academy. In this article, this framework is examined through the lens of science communication ethics and writer ethos to guide individuals while navigating between automation of literature databases and human agency. Furthermore, this article explores the proper citation of research claims from different genres that are published in the “medical literature” with attention to conserving the authors’ original voice. Collectively, this framework and discussion builds on prior scholarship on authorship and intellectual property in medicine.
Article Details
References
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Bartels, Else M. (2009). How to keep up with medical literature. Clinical Rheumatology, 23(2), 281–290.
Bates, Marcia J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-424.
Blakeslee, Ann M. (2001). Bridging the workplace and the academy: Teaching professional genres through classroom-workplace collaborations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(2), 169-192.
Charmaz, Kathy. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Citrome, Leslie, Moss, Stuart V., & Graf, Chris. (2009). How to search and harvest the medical literature: Let the citations come to you, and how to proceed when they do. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 63(11), 1565-1570.
Conklin, James, & Hayhoe, George F. (Eds.). (2010). Qualitative research in technical communication. Routledge.
Corbin, Juliet, & Strauss, Anselm. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Davidoff, Frank, DeAngelis, Catherine D., Drazen, Jeffrey M., Hoey, John, Hojgaard, Liselotte, Horton, Richard, Kotzin, Sheldon, Nicholls, M. Gary, Nylenna, Magne, Overbeke, A. John. P.M., Sox, Harold C., & Van Der Weyden, Martin B., & Wilkes, Michael S. (2001). Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345(11), 825-827.
Davies, Karen S. (2011). Physicians and their use of information: A survey comparison between the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 99(1), 88-91.
Derish, Pamela A., Maa, John, Ascher, Nancy L., & Harris, Hobart W. (2007). Enhancing the mission of academic surgery by promoting scientific writing skills. Journal of Surgical Research, 140(2), 177-183.
Eklund, Jan. (1995). Proper and accurate use of references. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 39(5), 575-576.
Friedman, Barbara A. (1982). Copyright from a permissions person's point of view. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 22(2), 70-72.
Garfield, Eugene. (1980). Has scientific communication changed in 300 years? Current Contents, 4(8), 394-400.
Gavras, Haralambos. (2002). Inappropriate attribution: The “lazy author syndrome.” American Journal of Hypertension, 15(9), 831.
George, Pierre M., & Robbins, Kathryn. (1994). Reference accuracy in the dermatologic literature. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 31(1), 61-64.
Goubil-Gambrell, Patricia. (1992). A practitioner’s guide to research methods. Technical Communication, 39(4), 582-591.
Grant, Maria M. (2001). Reading critically: Getting what you need from scientific papers. Canadian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, 63(1), 18-24.
Greenberg, Steven A. (2009). How citation distortions create unfounded authority: Analysis of a citation network. BMJ, 339, b2680.
Hansen, Margaret E., & McIntire, Donald D. (1994). Reference citations in radiology: Accuracy and appropriateness of use in two major journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 163(3), 719-723.
Hansoti, Bhakti, Langdorf, Mark I., & Murphy, Linda S. (2016). Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(5), 497-507.
Hartree, Edward F. (1976). Ethics for authors: A case history of acrosin. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 20(1), 82-91.
Holland, Matt. (2014). Re: What is the best web site to find citations of our research publications? https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-is-the-best-web-site-to-find-citations-of-our-research-publications/5324de53d3df3eea018b466d/citation/download
Ingelfinger F. J. (1976). Seduction by citation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 295(19), 1075-6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197611042951911
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
Jergas, Hannah, & Baethge, Christopher. (2015). Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles—a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ, 3, e1364.
Kapczynski, Amy. (2017). Order without intellectual property law: Open science in influenza. Cornell L. Rev., 102, 1539-1648.
Katz, Steven B., & Linvill, C. Claiborne. (2018). Lines and fields of ethical force in scientific authorship: The legitimacy and power of the office of research integrity. In Han Yu & Kathryn M. Northcut, Scientific communication: Practices, Theories, and Pedagogies (pp. 39-63). Routledge.
Koerber, Amy, & McMichael, Lonie. (2008). Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 454-473.
Latour, Bruno, & Woolgar, Steve. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
Luo, Ma, Charles Chuan, Domingo Molina IV, Clark R. Andersen, & Panchbhavi, Vinod K. (2013). Accuracy of citation and quotation in foot and ankle surgery journals. Foot & Ankle International, 34(7), 949-955.
Luzon, Maria Jose. (2007). The added value features of online scholarly journals. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(1), 59-73.
Lynch, John A. (2020). The ethics of rhetoric is the rhetoric of ethics: Refusing the call to codification. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(3), 249-257.
Melonçon, Lisa, Molloy, Cathryn, & Scott, J. Blake. (2020). Ethics in praxis: Situational, embodied, relational. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(4), 430-436.
Mogull, Scott A. (2008). A call for new courses to train scientists as effective communicators in contemporary government and business settings. Technical Communication, 55(4), 357-369.
Mogull, Scott A. (2017). Accuracy of cited “facts” in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate. PLOS ONE, 12(9): e0184727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184727
Mogull, Scott A. (2018a). Science vs. science commercialization in neoliberalism (extreme capitalism): Examining the conflicts and ethics of information sharing in opposing social systems. In Han Yu & Kathryn M. Northcut, Scientific communication: Practices, Theories, and Pedagogies (pp. 64-81). Routledge.
Mogull, Scott A. (2018b). Scientific and medical communication: A guide for effective practice. Routledge.
Mogull, Scott A., & Katz, Steven B. (2012). Science communication ethics vs. ethics in science [Conference presentation]. Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, St Louis, MO.
National Academy of Sciences (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). The National Academies Press.
Nigel Gilbert, G. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122.
Pavlovic, Vedrana, Weissgerber, Tracey, Stanisavljevic, Dejana, Pekmezovic, Tatjana, Milicevic, Ognjen, Lazovic, Jelena Milin, Cirkovic, Andja, Savic, Marko, Rajovic, Nina, Piperac, Pavle, Djuric, Nemanja, Madzarevic, Petar, Dimitrijevic, Ana, Randjelovic, Simona, Nestorovic, Emilija, Akinyombo, Remi, Pavlovic, Andrija, Ghamrawi, Ranine, Garovic, Vesna, & Milic, Natasa. (2021). How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature? Clinical Science, 135(5), 671-681.
Pirolli, Peter, & Card, Stuart. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643-675.
Ramji, Siddarth. (2011). Effective online search for medical literature. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities, 2(2), 189-191.
Rivkin, Anastasia. (2020). Manuscript referencing errors and their impact on shaping current evidence. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(7), 877-880.
Simkin, Mikhail V., & Roychowdhury, Vwani P. (2005). Stochastic modeling of citation slips. Scientometrics, 62(3), 367-384.
Simkin, Mikhail V., & Roychowdhury, Vwani P. (2007). A mathematical theory of citing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1661-1673.
Steen, R. Grant. (2011). Retractions in the medical literature: Who is responsible for scientific integrity? AMWA Journal, 26(1), 2-7.
Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University. (2020). https://browse.welch.jhmi.edu/citation-management
Yankauer Alfred. (1990). The accuracy of medical journal references. CBE Views, 13(2), 38-42.