“I could probably live to be 100”: An Embodied Approach to Action-Oriented Research with Vulnerable Populations

Main Article Content

Kathryn Yankura Swacha

Abstract

Action-oriented research strives to include vulnerable populations’ voices and to ensure reciprocity between academic and non-academic stakeholders to address complex problems. Challenges persist, however, in engaging community members beyond experts and reconciling differences in the timetables of such work. This article proposes an embodied approach to action-oriented research with vulnerable populations that calls attention to the situated, embodied aspects of the smaller moments through which complex problems are lived. By analyzing a case study of a project at a senior center for disadvantaged older adults—with a particular focus on time, place, and bodies—the piece articulates the implications of such an approach for theory, methodology, and practice in both localized contexts and RHM more broadly.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

References

Arduser, Lora. (2017). Living chronic: Agency and expertise in the rhetoric of diabetes. The

Ohio State University Press.

Agarwal, Ekta, Miller, Michelle D., Yaxley, Alison & Isenring, Elisabeth A. (2013). Malnutrition in the elderly: A narrative review. Maturitas, 76(4), 296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.07.013

Baldwinson, Raquel. (2018). Ethics for rhetoric, the rhetoric of ethics, and rhetorical ethics in health and medicine. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 1(3– 4), 213– 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2018.1012

Baker, Tamara A. & Wang, Caroline C. (2006). Photovoice: Use of a participatory action research method to explore the chronic pain experience in older adults. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1405-1413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732306294118

Bay, Jennifer (2019). Research justice as reciprocity: Homegrown research methodologies. Community Literacy Journal, 14(1), 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/clj.2019.0019

Bay, Jennifer & Swacha, Kathryn Y. (2020). Community-engaged research as enmeshed practice. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 26(1), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.108

Bellwoar, Hannah. (2012). Everyday matters: Reception and use as productive design of health related texts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2012.702533.

Bivens, Kristin M. (2018). Rhetorically listening for microwithdrawals of consent in research practice. In Lisa Melonçon & J.Blake Scott (Eds.). Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 138-156). Routledge.

Bonevski, Billie, Randell, Madeleine, Paul, Chris, Chapman, Kathy, Twyman, Laura, Bryant, Jamie, Brozek, Irena & Hughes, Clare (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Biomedical Research Methodology, 14, 1–29. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-42

Brown, Angie & Draper, Peter. (2003). Accommodative speech and terms of endearment: Elements of a language mode often experienced by older adults. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(1).15-21. https://doi-org. /10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02500.x

Brown, Valerie A., Harris, John A., & Russell, Jacqueline. (Eds.) (2010). Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination. Routledge.

Campbell, Lillian & Angeli, Elizabeth L. (2019). Embodied healthcare intuition: A taxonomy of sensory cues used by healthcare providers. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 2(4), 353-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2019.1017

Cardinal, Alison (2019). Participatory video: An apparatus for ethically researching literacy,

power and embodiment. Computers and Composition, 53, 34-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.05.003

Clark, Tom (2008). We’re over-researched here! Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094573

Clayson, Ashley (2018). Distributed writing as a lens for examining writing as embodied practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1479607

Cooper, Marilyn. (2011). Rhetorical agency as emergent and enacted. College Composition & Communication, 62(3), 420-449. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27917907

DeVasto, Danielle, Graham, S. Scott, Card, Daniel, & Kessler, Molly (2019). Interventional systems ethnography and intersecting injustices: A new approach for fostering reciprocal community engagement. Community Literacy Journal, 14(1), 44-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/clj.2019.0021

Dibartolo, Mary C. & McCrone, Susan (2003). Recruitment of rural community-dwelling older adults: Barriers, challenges, and strategies. Aging & Mental Health, 7(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360786031000072295

Dostilio, Lina D., Brackmann, Sarah M., Edwards, Kathleen E., Harrison, Barbara, Kliewer, Brandon W., & Clayton, Patti H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19(1), 17-32. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0019.102

Durá, Lucia, Salas, Consuelo, Medina-Jerez, Wiliam, & Hill, Virginia (2015). De aquí y de allá: Changing perceptions of literacy through food pedagogy, asset-based narratives, and hybrid spaces. Community Literacy Journal, 10(1), 21-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/clj.2015.0015

Edbauer, Jenny. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4). 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391320

Ellard-Gray, Amy, Jeffrey, Nicole K., Choubak, Melisa, & Crann, Sara E. (2015). Finding the hidden participants: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621420

Flores-Hutson, Patricia, Maier, Maria I., Carrizal-Dukes, Elvira, Durá, Lucia, & Gonzales, Laura (2019). La salud en mis manos: Localizing health and wellness literacies in transnational communities through participatory mindfulness and art-based projects. Present Tense, 7(3).

Fountain, T. Kenny. (2014). Rhetoric in the flesh: Trained vision, technical expertise, and the gross anatomy lab. Routledge.

Furman, Ellen F. (2006). Undernutrition in older adults across the continuum of care: Nutritional assessment, barriers, and interventions. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 32(1), 22-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-20060101-11

Genoe, Rebecca & Dupuis, Sherry. (2013). Picturing leisure: Using photovoice to understand leisure and dementia. The Qualitative Report, 18(11), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1545

Goldberg-Freeman, Clara, Kass, Nancy E., Tracey, Patricia, Ross, Glenn, Bates-Hopkins, Barbara, Purnell, Leon, Canniffe, Bernard, & Farfel, Mark. (2007). ‘You’ve got to understand community:’ Community perceptions on ‘breaking the disconnect’ between researchers and communities. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 1(3). doi:10.1353/cpr.2007.0021.

Gouge, Catherine C. (2016). Improving patient discharge communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(4), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616646749

Gries, Laurie. (2012). Agential matters. Tumbleweeds, women-pens, citizen-hope, and rhetorical actancy. In S.J. Dobrin (Ed.), Ecology, writing theory, and new media (pp. 67-91). Routledge.

Hergenrather, Kenneth C., Rhodes, Scott D., Cowan, Chris A., Bardhoshi, Gerta, & Pula, Sara (2009). Photovoice as community-based participatory research: A qualitative review. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(6), 686-698. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.33.6.6

Jensen, Robin. (2016). Infertility: Tracing the history of a transformative term. The Penn State University Press.

Jih, Jane, Stijacic-Cenzer, Irena, Seligman, Hilary, K., Boscardin, W John, Nguyen, Tung T., & Ritchie, Christine, S. (2018). Chronic disease burden predicts food insecurity among older adults. Public Health Nutrition, 21(9), 1737-1742. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017004062

Jolivétte, Andrew J. (Ed.). (2015). Research Justice: Methodologies for Social Change. Policy Press.

Jordan, John W. (2009). Reshaping the ‘pillow angel:’ Plastic bodies and the rhetoric of normal surgical solutions. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95(1), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802621060

Jurkowski, Janine M. & Paul-Ward, Amy. (2007). Photovoice with vulnerable populations: Addressing disparities in health promotion among people with intellectual disabilities. Health Promotion Practice, 8(4), 358-65. doi: 10.1177/1524839906292181

Keränen, Lisa. (2007). “Cause Someday We All Die:” Rhetoric, agency, and the case of the ‘patient’ preferences worksheet. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 9(2), 179-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630701425100

Kessler, Molly Margaret (2020). The ostomy multiple: Toward a theory of rhetorical enactments. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(3), 293-319. https://doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2020.1016

Koerber, Amy (2018). From Hysteria to Hormones: A Rhetorical History.

The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Kuehl, Rebecca A., Anderson, Jenn, Mehltretter Drury, Sara A., Holman, Amanda, Hunt, Cerise, & Leighter, Jay L. (2020). Creating a multidisciplinary dialogue about community-based participatory research partnerships in health and medicine. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(1), 93-132. https://doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2020.1004

Lauer, Claire (2020). Implementing a transactional design model to ensure mindful development of public-facing science communication projects. Communication Design Quarterly, 8(3), 4-15. 10.1145/3410430.3410431

Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. (2003). Rethinking rhetoric through mental disabilities. Rhetoric Review, 22(2), 156-167. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3093036

Melonçon, Lisa. (2018). Bringing the body back through performative phenomenology. In Lisa Melonçon & J. Blake Scott (Eds.). Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine. Routledge.

Melonçon, Lisa. (2017). Patient experience design: Expanding usability methodologies for healthcare contexts. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(2), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131201.3131203

Moll, Luis C. & Greenberg, James B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In Luis C. Moll (Ed.) Vygotsky and education: Instructional implication and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319-348). Cambridge UP.

Molloy, Cathryn, Beemer, Cristy, Bennett, Jeffrey, Green, Ann, Johnson, Jenell, Kessler, Molly, Novotny, Maria, & Siegel-Finer, Bryna. (2018). A dialogue on possibilities for embodied methodologies in the rhetoric of health & medicine. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 1(3 4), 349-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2018.1017

Noice, Tony, Noice, Helga, & Kramer, Arthur F. (2014). Participatory arts for older adults: A review of benefits and challenges. Gerontologist, 54(5), 741-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt138

Nord, Mark, Andrews, Margaret, & Carlson, Steven. (2005). Household food security in the United States, 2005 (USDA Publication No. 29). USDA Economic Research Service.

Novek, Sheila, Morris-Oswald, Toni, & Menec, Verena (2012). Using photovoice with older adults: Some methodological strengths and issues. Ageing and Society, 32(3), 451-470. 10.1017/S0144686X11000377

Opel, Dawn S. (2018). Challenging the rhetorical conception of health literacy: Aging, interdependence, and networked caregiving. LiCS, 6(2), 136-150. 10.21623/1.6.2.9

Pigozzi, Laura M. (2018). Negotiating informed consent: bueno aconsejar, mejor remediar (it is good to give advice, but it is better to solve the problem). In Lisa Melonçon & J. Blake Scott (Eds.). Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 195-213). Routledge.

Rittel, Horst W. J., & Webber, Melvin M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Rose, Emma J. (2016). Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46 (4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653494

Rose, Emma J. & Walton, Rebecca. (2018). Factors to actors: Implications of posthumanism for social justice work. In Kristen R. Moore & Daniel P. Richards (Eds.). Posthuman praxis in Technical Communication (pp. 91-117). Routledge.

Rose, Nikolas (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press.

Scott, J.Blake & Melonçon, Lisa (2018). Manifesting methodologies for the rhetoric of health & medicine. In Lisa Melonçon & J. Blake Scott (Eds.). Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health & Medicine (pp. 1-23). Routledge.

Scott, J. Blake & Melonçon, Lisa. (2020). Editorial reflections. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(1), iii -xii. https://doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2020.1000

Scott, J. Blake, Melonçon, Lisa, & Molloy, Cathryn (2020). RHM Generosity. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(3), iii-xiv. 10.5744/rhm.2020.1013

Serres, Michel (1989). A History of Scientific Thought: Elements of a History of Science. Blackwell.

Shen, Megan Johnson, Manna, Ruth, Banerjee, Smita C., Nelson, Christian J., Alexander, Koshy, Alici, Yesne, Gangai, Natalie, Parker, Patricia A., & Korc-Grodzicki, Beatriz (2020). Incorporating shared decision making into communication with older adults with cancer and their caregivers: Development and evaluation of a geriatric shared decision-making communication skills training module. Patient Education and Counseling 103, 2328 2334. 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.032

St. Amant, Kirk (2021). Creating scripts for crisis communication: COVID-19 and beyond. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920959191

Strauss, Anselm M., & Corbin, Juliet. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.

Swacha, Kathryn Y. (2018). ‘Bridging the Gap between Food Pantries and the Kitchen Table:’ Teaching embodied literacy in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 261-282. 10.1080/10572252.2018.1476589

Thompson, Isabelle. (2009). Scaffolding in the writing center: A microanalysis of an experienced tutor’s verbal and nonverbal tutoring strategies. Written Communication, 26(4), 417–453. doi:10.1177/0741088309342364

Verwijs, Marije H., Puijk-Hekman, Saskia, van der Heijden, Ellen, Vasse, Emmelyne, de Groot, Lisette, & de van der Schueren, Marian. (2019). Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration as key to improved nutritional care of malnourished older adults across health-care settings: A qualitative study. Health Expectations, 23, 1096-1107. 10.1111/hex.13075

Walton, Rebecca, Zraly, Maggie, & Mugengana, Jean Pierre (2015). Value and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975962

Williams, Kristine, Kemper, Susan, & Hummert, Mary Lee (2003). Improving nursing home communication: An intervention to reduce elderspeak. The Gerontologist, 43(2), 242 247. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.2.242

Yankeelov, Pamela A., Faul, Anna C., D’Ambrosio, Joseph G., Collins, Wanda L., & Gordon, Barbara (2015). ‘Another day in paradise:’ A photovoice journey of rural older adults living with diabetes. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813493136