Main Article Content
Over the last several decades there have been rapid advancements in treatment options available for infertility. Consequently, infertility has become a medicalized disease, which privileges a masculine epistemology. Problematically, this masculinist perception of infertility diminishes concern for the lived experiences of women living with infertility and ignores the many ways in which infertility manifests as a social condition. This study examines narratives of women diagnosed with infertility, gathered from online support groups. Through these narratives I introduces the concept of “invitational knowledge” as a means to understand how knowledge functions rhetorically to create space for discourses that deviate from the medicalized assumptions of infertility. Invitational knowledge highlights the epistemological roots of invitational rhetoric through adoption of a postmodern feminist epistemology and is characterized by five features: 1) rhetor agency; 2) emotional knowledge; 3) transformative discourse; 4) shared knowledge; and 5) asking questions rather than making judgments.
Allen, K. R. & Baber, K. M. (1992). Ethical and epistemological tensions in applying a postmodern perspective to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 1-15.
Baier, A. (1985). Postures of the mind: Essays on mind and morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Becker, G., & Nachtigall, R. D. (1992). Eager for medicalisation: Thee social production of infertility as a disease. Sociology of Health & Illness, 14(4), 456-471.
Bell, A. V. (2010). Beyond (financial) accessibility: Inequalities within the medicalisation of infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(4), 631-646.
Bone, J.E., Griffin, C. L. & Scholz, T. M. L. (2008). Beyond traditional conceptualizations of rhetoric: Invitational rhetoric and a move towards civility. Western Journal of Communication, 72(4), 434-462.
Cassell, M. M., Jackson, C., & Cheuvront, C. (1998). Health communication on the Internet: An effective channel for health behavior change? Journal of Health Communication 3(1), 71-79.
Clarke, L. H., Martin-Matthews, A., & Matthews, R. (2006). The continuity and discontinuity of the embodied self in infertility. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 43(1), 95-113.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination, In Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (pp. 221-238). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Cousineau, T. M., Green, T. C.,. Corsini, E. A., Barnard, T., Seibring, A. R., & Domar, A. D. (2006). Development and validation of the infertility self-efficacy scale. Fertility and Sterility, 85(6), 1684-1696.
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narrative and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(4), 13614-13620.
Di Stepheno, C. (1990). Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity, and postmodernism. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
Dutta, M. J. (2006). The unheard voices of santalis: Communicating about health from the margins of India. Communication Theory, 14(3), 237-263.
Dutta, M. J. (2007). Communicating about culture and health: Theorizing culture-centered and cultural sensitivity approaches. Communication Theory, 17, 304-328.
Ebert, T. L. (1991). The “difference" of postmodern feminism. College English, 53(8), 886-904.
Ellingson, L. L. (2006). Embodied knowledge: Writing researcher’s bodies into qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(1), 298-310.
Fonow, M. M. & Cook, J. A. (1991). Beyond Methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Foss, S K., & Griffin, C. L. (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 2-18.
Foss, S. K., & Griffin C. L. (in press). The metatheoretical foundations of invitational rhetoric: Axiological, Epistemological, and ontological assumptions. In S. K. Foss & C. L. Griffin (Eds.) Inviting understanding: A portrait of invitational rhetoric. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fertility IQ, (n.d.) Cost. Retrieved from https://www.fertilityiq.com/topics/cost
Fisher, W. R. (1985). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1-22.
Griel, A. L., & McQuillan, J. (2010). Trying times: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 24(1), 137-156.
Greil, A., McQuillan, J., & Slauson‐Blevins, K. (2011). The social construction of infertility." Sociology Compass, 5(8), 736-746.
Haslanger, S. (1999). What knowledge is and what it ought to be: Feminist values and normative epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 13, 459-480.
Hawkesworth, M. E. (1989). Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(3), 533-557.
Hayden, S. (1997). Reclaiming bodies of knowledge: An exploration of the relationship between feminist theorizing and feminine style in the rhetoric of the Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. Western Journal of Communication, 61(2), 127-163.
Hermann, D., Scherg, H., Verres, R., von Hagens C., Strowitzki, T., & Wischmann, T. (2011). Resilience in infertile couples acts as a protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetrics 28(11), 1111-1117.
Hinton, L. Kurinczuk, J.J. & Ziebland, S. (2010). Infertility; isolation and the Internet: A qualitative interview study. Patient education and counseling, 81 (3), 436-441.
hooks, b. (1987). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End.
Kahlor, L. & Mackert, M. (2009). Perceptions of infertility information and support sources among female patients who access the Internet. Fertility and Sterility, 91 (1), 83-90.
Jensen, R. E. (2016). Infertility. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Jensen, R. E. (2015). From barren to sterile: The evolution of a mixed metaphor, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45(1), 24-46.
Lukse, M. P., & Vacc, N. A. (1999). Grief, depression, and coping in women undergoing infertility treatment. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 93(2), 245-251.
Macaluso, M., Weight-Schnapp, T. J., Chandra, A., Johnson, R.,. Satterwhite, C. L., Pulver, A., Berman, S. M., Wang, R. Y.,. Farr, S. L., & Pollack, L. A. (2010). A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management. Fertility and Sterility, 93(1), 16.e1-16.e10.
Mascarenhas, M., Flaxmn, S., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., & Stevens, G. A. (2012). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systemic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Medicine 9(12), e1001355.
Massanari, A. (2017). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture supports toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19 (3), 239-346.
Massanari, A. (2013). Playful participatory culture: Learning from Reddit, AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 3.
Mishler, E.G., Amarasingham, L. R., Osherson, S. D., Hauser, S. T., Waxler, N. E. & Liem, R. (1981). Social Contexts of Health, Illness, and Patient Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, C. & Chuang, L. (2017). Redditors revealed: Motivational factors of the Reddit community. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2313-2322.
Paul, M. S., Berger, R., Berlow, N., Rovner-Ferguson, H., Figlerski, L., Gardner, S., & Malave, A. F. (2009). Posttraumatic growth and social support in individuals with infertility. Human Reproduction, 25(1), 133-141.
Ridenour, A. F., Yorgason, J. B., & Peterson, B. (2009). The infertility resilience model: Assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 34-51.
Ryan, K. J., & Natalle, E. J. (2009). Fusing horizons: Standpoint hermeneutics and invitational rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31(2), 69-90.
Schraf, B. F. (1995). Poster art as women’s rhetoric: Raising awareness about breast cancer. Literature and Medicine, 14 (1), 72-86.
Stanley, L. (1997). Methodology matters!” In V. Robinson & D. Richardson (Eds.), Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist theory and practice. London: Macmillan Press.
Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M. N., Perez, A. L., Harms, P. D., & Lester, P. B. (2016). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta‐analytic review of resilience‐building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 278-307.
Young-Bruehl, E. (1987). The education of women as philosophers. Signs, 12, 207-221.