An Ethics-of-Care Paradigm in Opposition Research The Tensions of Studying a Pro-Life Organization

Main Article Content

Sommer Marie Sterud

Abstract

This paper explores how I navigated the complicated terrain of opposition research during the dissertation phase of my doctoral program. Drawing from ethnographic research conducted on a pro-life organization, I illustrate that care-based ethics (Held, 2006; Tronto, 1994) is not just for vulnerable and agreeable participants but is valuable and appropriate for researching powerful groups whom we oppose. Furthermore, I argue that rhetorical listening (Glenn & Ratcliffe, 2011; Ratcliffe, 1999, Ratcliffe, 2005) is not just a valuable methodological approach to research, but also a form of reciprocity, especially critical when studying groups we oppose. Such an approach promotes the mutually beneficial goals of respect and understanding. 

Article Details

Section
Special Section on Ethics
Author Biography

Sommer Marie Sterud, Kent State University

Sommer is a Phd candidate, teaching fellow, and feminist researcher who is currently doing ethnographic work on a pro-life organization. Her general research areas, however, are social movements, activism, and civic engagement.

References

References

Barky, S. (1990) Feminism and domination. New York, NY: Routledge.

Barton, E. (2008) “Further contributions from the ethical turn in composition/rhetoric: analyzing ethics in interaction.” College Composition and Communication 59: 596-632.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). “Studies in interactional sociolinguistics,” Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Cushman, E. (1996). “The rhetorician as an agent of social change.” College
Composition and Communication 47: 7–28.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face interaction. Oxford, England: Aldine.

Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Kirsch, G., and Sullivan, P. (1992). Methods and methodology in composition research. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.

Nash, E. (2019) “Unprecedented wave of abortion bans is an urgent call to action,” The Guttmacher Institute, https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/05/unprecedented-wave-abortion-bans-urgent-call-action.

Perl, S. (1999).“Early work on composing: lessons and illuminations.” History,
reflection, and narrative: The professionalization of composition, 1963–1983. Ed. Rosner, M, Boehm, B. and

Journet, D. (2012) Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press. 83–98.

Powell, K., and Takayoshi, P. (2003). "Accepting roles created for us: The ethics of reciprocity." College Composition and Communication 54.3: 394-422.

Selfe, C.L., Hawisher, G.E., et al. “Digital media & transnational connections: from Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Sydney, Australia,” Transnational Literate Lives In Digital Times,” https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/transnational/.

Stormer, N. (2015). Signs of Pathology: U.S. Medical Rhetoric on Abortion, 1800s-1960s. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Tong, R. (2018). Feminist thought A more comprehensive introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.

Tronto, J. (1994). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.